California Law and Ethics Practice Exam

What must practitioners consider when determining the appropriateness of entering a dual relationship?

1. The financial benefits for the therapist

2. The client's past relationships with other practitioners

3. The practitioner’s authority in the previous relationship

4. The therapist's own personal needs

The correct answer is: The practitioner’s authority in the previous relationship

When determining the appropriateness of entering a dual relationship, practitioners must carefully consider the practitioner’s authority in the previous relationship. This factor is crucial because a dual relationship often blurs the boundaries of professional roles, potentially leading to conflicts of interest or ethical dilemmas. If the practitioner holds a position of authority in another context—such as being a supervisor, teacher, or medical provider—entering a dual relationship can complicate the professional dynamics and possibly exploit the client’s vulnerability. The client may subconsciously feel pressured to comply or may not be able to freely give informed consent due to the power imbalance. Therefore, understanding this authority dynamic is essential in maintaining ethical standards, ensuring that the client’s best interests are prioritized, and avoiding situations that could be seen as coerced or non-consensual, even when both parties agree to the dual relationship. This consideration helps safeguard both the client and practitioner from the negative impacts that can arise from blurred boundaries and ensures that trust in the therapeutic or professional relationship remains intact.